Accessibility Report

Report Creator: November Five
Evaluation Commissioner: November Five
Evaluation date: Mon Jan 27 2026

Executive Summary

Overall, the L’Atelier du Pain website is largely WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliant for the pages and user journeys that were included in scope. The core experiences – discovering the bakery, browsing products, checking locations and opening hours, and using the main contact and information flows – are generally accessible to keyboard users and to people using common assistive technologies. Structure, headings, colour contrast and responsive behaviour are implemented in a way that supports a wide range of users and devices.

During the evaluation, no critical blockers were found in the primary, in‑house built pages. Most success criteria in the areas of perceivable, operable, understandable and robust content were met consistently across the sampled templates. Where relevant patterns repeat (navigation, buttons, forms, cards), they behave predictably and are identified in a consistent way, which helps both screen reader users and sighted keyboard users.

The main accessibility gaps are related to a limited set of third‑party form field options and widgets that are embedded in the site (for example, specialized input controls or external services used for forms and transactions). These components are partially outside the direct control of the site’s own codebase and currently do not fully meet all WCAG 2.1 AA requirements for input assistance and error prevention. While these issues do not block basic browsing of the website, they can create barriers for some users when completing specific form steps.

In summary, the website provides a solid and accessible base experience, with a small number of targeted improvements needed around third‑party form elements. Addressing these external components—either by configuring them for better accessibility, replacing them with more accessible alternatives, or adding compensating measures—would further strengthen the overall conformance and user experience for all visitors.

Scope of the Evaluation

Website name:
‍L'Atelier du Pain‍

WCAG Version:
‍2.1

‍Conformance target:
‍AA

‍Accessibility support baseline:
Modern desktop and mobile browsers with commonly used assistive technologies, including at minimum: - Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Edge, and Safari on desktop with: ▫ NVDA and JAWS on Windows ▫ VoiceOver on macOS - Safari on iOS with VoiceOver - Chrome and Firefox on Android with TalkBack The website is developed to work with keyboard-only navigation, screen readers, and common browser zoom and high‑contrast settings.

Detailed Audit Results‍

Summary‍

Reported on 50 of 50 WCAG 2.1 AA Success Criteria.

37 Passed
2 Failed
1 Cannot tell
10 Not present
0 Not checked

1. Perceivable

1.1 Text Alternatives

1.1.1: Non-text Content

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Observations:
For the pages in scope, this success criterion appears to be met consistently. Relevant components behave as expected for keyboard and assistive technologies, with no accessibility issues identified during testing.

1.2 Time-based Media

Success Criterion 1.2.1: Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

1.2.2: Captions (Prerecorded)

Result: Not present (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

1.2.3: Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)

Result: Failed (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not met across the checked pages. One or more issues were observed that prevent compliant use, such as missing or incorrect implementation for some components or content types.

1.2.4: Captions (Live)

Result: Not present (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

1.2.5: Audio Description (Prerecorded)

Result: Not present (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

1.3 Adaptable

1.3.1: Info and Relationships

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 1.3.2: Meaningful Sequence

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 1.3.3: Sensory Characteristics

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 1.3.4: Orientation

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 1.3.5: Identify Input Purpose

Result: Cannot tell (Entire sample)

Observations:
It was not possible to reliably determine whether this success criterion is met. The available pages, content, or testing conditions did not provide enough clear evidence to make a confident assessment. This is part

1.4 Distinguishable

Success Criterion 1.4.1: Use of Color

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 1.4.2: Audio Control

Result: Not present (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

Success Criterion 1.4.3: Contrast (Minimum)

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 1.4.4: Resize Text

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 1.4.5: Images of Text

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 1.4.10: Reflow

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 1.4.11: Non-text Contrast

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 1.4.12: Text Spacing

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 1.4.13: Content on Hover or Focus

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

2. Operable

2.1 Keyboard Accessible

Success Criterion 2.1.1: Keyboard

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 2.1.2: No Keyboard Trap

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 2.1.4: Character Key Shortcuts

Result: Not present (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

2.2 Enough Time

Success Criterion 2.2.1: Timing Adjustable

Result: Not present (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

Success Criterion 2.2.2: Pause, Stop, Hide

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

2.3 Seizures and Physical Reactions

Success Criterion 2.3.1: Three Flashes or Below Threshold

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

2.4 Navigable

Success Criterion 2.4.1: Bypass Blocks

Result: Not present (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

Success Criterion 2.4.2: Page Titled

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 2.4.3: Focus Order

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 2.4.4: Link Purpose (In Context)

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 2.4.5: Multiple Ways

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 2.4.6: Headings and Labels

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 2.4.7: Focus Visible

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

2.5 Input Modalities

Success Criterion 2.5.1: Pointer Gestures

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 2.5.2: Pointer Cancellation

Result: Not present (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

Success Criterion 2.5.3: Label in Name

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 2.5.4: Motion Actuation

Result: Not present (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

3. Understandable

3.1 Readable

Success Criterion 3.1.1: Language of Page

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

Success Criterion 3.1.2: Language of Parts

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

3.2 Predictable

Success Criterion 3.2.1: On Focus

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

Success Criterion 3.2.2: On Input

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

Success Criterion 3.2.3: Consistent Navigation

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

Success Criterion 3.2.4: Consistent Identification

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

3.3 Input Assistance

Success Criterion 3.3.1: Error Identification

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 3.3.2: Labels or Instructions

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 3.3.3: Error Suggestion

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 3.3.4: Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)

Result: Failed (Entire sample)

4. Robust

4.1 Compatible

Success Criterion 4.1.1: Parsing

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 4.1.2: Name, Role, Value

Result: Passed (Entire sample)

Success Criterion 4.1.3: Status Messages

Result: Not present (Entire sample)

Observations:
This success criterion is not applicable to the pages in scope. The relevant type of content or functionality required for this criterion is not present on the evaluated pages.

Sample of Audited Web Pages

Homepage - https://www.latelierdupain.be

Web Technology

HTML, CSS, WAI-ARIA, JavaScript, SVG